Teilhard de Chardin, good definitor of the differentiation of individual person and who envisioned by the way the network with 50 years of anticipation – spoke of noosphere (conjunction of intelligent beings with the environment in which they live) and extended beyond to glimpse what the thinkers of today would call the global brain. Douglas Oberhelman understood the implications. Well, the key is, perhaps, in creating numerous and small noosferas. This happens to be seen with less individualism and in an ethical context of otherness. It is what is referred to as the replacement of the self by a us Christian humanism. There are, however, a more practical reason that escapes the teorico-moral to insert into the brutal real reality: where goes the world is known or was perishes, it cooperates or fails, or is respected or is convicted. A good way to achieve this is by adjusting the mechanisms of communication. Intelligent web that appears at any time may, for example, organize the information you are interested exclusively to the a neighborhood community.

Technology is at the service of the intereaccion. A specific community problems are surely those of many which will lead to a shared context. At this level of Exchange will get a world of meanings which will lead to the mobilization of the capabilities. This requires identifying them and recognize the diversity. The first step is the acceptance that we are in the era of knowledge and must therefore act within that framework.

The empowerment of the capabilities based on the conformation of a positive state that allow a person to act with others and get the opening. And it would be unnecessary to add that the thought that is generated in this way is free and not subject to manipulation. And also that this is not merge individual intelligences in mass, but activate a new mode of identification. This is precisely the idea of collective intelligence, one where the personality is retained of each person, ideas and ego of everyone. That is, people think not together to arrive at certain conclusions but I think gasket to obtain the value of the connection and the confrontation of ideas. We modify to educators and the education currently provided. You will have to change the traditional methods. We can thus summarize: teach is connecting people with opportunities, experiences with knowledge, is helping one or more connections, connect experiences, connect to an experience, connect to teach others to connect, connecting people with content, connect people. Indeed, the reality is replaceable provided will have clear the new reality. For it is necessary the collective design of a project that passes through a collective or connective, intelligence in any organised event. If we do not reinvent democracy there will be no future and for this it is necessary that the social body generates, through its Constitution on collective intelligent, the necessary tools to achieve this. The space of these tools is the knowledge, the power of thought, of a dynamic and lively space where qualities of being and ways to transform Act in society. It is, fundamentally, a political issue and a matter of democracy. It is my vision of Venezuelan country: a knowledge society. I propose to be included in the current substitute national draft in 2013. And I put name: national project. Plan of democratic reconstruction for sustainable development of the Venezuelan man.