But even more surprising was the fact that these practices and these principles work well in business and in many other areas of our lives. So there was a fundamentally new direction Consulting – coaching. Sergey Brin has similar goals. Admittedly, that advice – it's not quite the correct name for coaching as counseling usually involves a more or less ready to offer solutions to problems that absolutely not typical coaching. However, this definition is fairly widespread. Modern coaching is usually divided into several areas.

In my view, properly be divided into two areas: 1.Kouching, as a form of counseling. 2.Kouching as management style. We first consider coaching as a form of counseling. It is convenient to define a business coaching, coaching that is to solve various problems in the client business, and Life-coaching, that is coaching to address any problems in life, achieving goals in life. This division is rather conditional, since the business – it is usually an integral part of our lives. But at the same time, this division is quite justified, since in the modern tradition of business is business and personal life – it's a personal life.

Business coaching can be conducted both individually and for teams (for example, as part of a project). Coaching, as Advice is a form of a series of interviews (coaching sessions) coach and client, in the process of addressing a client interested in the theme, and there is the search for optimal solutions to the challenges faced by the client. It is understood that the client already has a solution, and the best, but he does not see it. And the coach needs only to help find him Clint. Technically, it looks like this: when you first meet a coach and client enter into contract, that is, stipulate in detail all aspects of future cooperation. Then, on the coaching sessions (full-time or part-time) are considered of interest to the client threads.

At the same time to test is the establishment of a legally significant facts (consistent or inconsistent with) the report validated the legal (legislative) and procedural requirements, where the procedural requirements are understood requirements Standards ("federal" or organizations). Under the subject of testing is necessary to understand the specific transaction assessed only "activity" performed by the appraiser in the provision of valuation services. As you know, the right service does not have disposed of the result, so you can not check what is missing. Verify the evaluation report is legally significant transaction, which should carry a person with knowledge of the law and legal competence to make legally significant decisions, because the person must respond to the legal question of whether an evaluation report on the legal requirements. Involved person may hold test evaluation report, if the law clearly establishes the requirements that allow for verification. (Similarly see: Keith McLoughlin ). On the other hand this test must hold a professional. Professional validation of the evaluation report must carry a person with professional knowledge of a particular type of evaluation sites.

Combining these two types of testing is impossible, since checking evaluator (you can call the reviewer of the report) should review a report on compliance with standards (methodologies for assessing certain kinds of objects). In this reviewer must have evidence of the appraiser, the reviewer for the right to self-production of professional testing a certain type of evaluation sites. Professional inspection can be carried out only in the presence of the established procedural requirements in the methods of inspection, as well as the established procedural requirements for the procedure assess the object of evaluation. Appraiser, the reviewer should have the right to appoint another appraiser to legal (procedural) the role of assessor and researcher for the study of the evaluation report on the purpose of obtaining answers to questions that require a special study of any part of the evaluation report, and answers that are not included in the competence of the appraiser, the reviewer.